Draw the process once. It runs itself after that.

A canvas for the tasks your team repeats. Put the steps in order, set the conditions, choose what starts it, and decide where a person still needs to sign.

Run historytoday
Form submitted by Nurul Aisyah09:02
Record created09:02
Routed to Finance, $78009:02
Waiting on Finance approval

The diagram is the thing that runs.

Not a flowchart somebody drew in a document and then implemented separately. What you lay out on the canvas is what executes, which is why it never drifts from the documentation.

Lay the process out once

Drag the steps into the order your team already works in, then set the conditions that decide where a request goes. No code, and the diagram is the thing that runs rather than documentation of it.

Claim intake Live
TriggerForm submitted
StepCreate the record
BranchAmount over $500?
ApprovalFinance signs off
StepNotify and file

It starts on its own

Bind a workflow to a form submission, a schedule, or a record changing. Recurring steps repeat until the thing you were waiting for arrives, then stop.

Runs when
A form is submittedtrigger
Daily at 09:00schedule
Until the document arrivesrepeat

A person can sit in the middle

Any step can pause for a named approver. The run holds there, visible, until somebody decides, and picks up exactly where it left off.

Changing it never breaks what is running

Edits apply to new requests. Anything already in flight finishes on the version it started on, so nobody's half-finished claim takes a different path mid-approval.

Versionv3 active
New requests use v3
12 in flight stay on v2unbroken

Drag the steps into place. Watch it run before it goes live.

A canvas, not a config file. Put the steps in the order your process actually happens, set the conditions in plain terms, then run it against real data and watch each step report back. Changing your own process should not require raising a ticket.

  • Drag steps onto the canvas and connect them
  • Branch on plain conditions, not expressions
  • Test with real data and inspect what each step returned
  • Re-run a single step instead of the whole flow
Invoice arrivesTrigger
Match to the POStep
Totals agreeFile it
Totals differAsk supplier
Finance signsApproval
Ready

Wired into the systems the work already lives in.

Steps that touch real records

A workflow reads and writes the same employee and customer records the rest of Cova uses, so it acts on live data rather than a copy.

It can reach outside

Where a system has an API, the workflow calls it. Where one does not, it can hand the step to the agentic computer instead.

Recurring until done

Chases repeat on their own schedule and stop themselves once the condition is met, rather than running forever or needing a person to cancel them.

Every run is inspectable

Open any run and see which branch it took, what it wrote, who approved it and where it is waiting.

Frequently asked questions

The building experience is familiar: a canvas, steps, conditions, triggers. The difference is what it is wired into. A Cova workflow acts on your actual employee and customer records, can pause for a named approver inside your org chart, and can hand a step to an agent when the target system has no API.

What does your team redo every single week?

Bring us one of those. We will lay it out on the canvas with your approvers and your conditions, and show you it running.

Book a demo